Dave Dale has written in his column: “It is unclear exactly what she’ll be doing, but it can’t be bad for her Nipissing riding. Let’s hope not, anyway. Revenue means taxes, usually, and fees for government services and other nasty devices no longer called taxes.” Combine this statement with the title of his column, and what you get is failed humour at best. At worst, it is a ham-fisted attempt to equate our dislike of paying taxes with our MPP.

Damn that Monique Smith for inventing taxes …

Dale subsequently speculates on Maureen Boldt’s strategy to retain her seat. Apparently, it boils down to playing possum, and begging for mercy. He also professes to know in advance how she and her detractors will argue their cases. And then, he drops a steaming cow paddy of innuendo onto the page: “Others will want to know exactly what Boldt did for the community, other than attend meetings and stir the political pot for the Grits in the hopes of a riding nomination.”

Who are these “others”, and what role do they play in choosing whether or not to unseat a city councilor?

Will Boldt’s fate be determined by other councilor’s attitude toward her performance? Is that the issue? Is it reasonable to consider her political affiliations (real or imagined) when deciding whether to grant her the leave of absence she is expected to request?

When elected officials can remove another elected official from office, we should not forget that the will of the electorate may be subverted in the process. Maureen Boldt was elected by the citizens of North Bay. The conditions under which she is un-elected should be very clear and free from any mechanism of political tampering. For example, if she is removed, it should not be for partisan-political reasons.

If there is a rule in place to unseat a councilor who can’t fulfill his or her duties, and council can create an exception to that rule, there is potential for inappropriate political manipulation.

As Dale points out in his column, Ms. Boldt’s “professional misunderstanding” is at least a decade old. Therefore, people in North Bay made their voting decision knowing that she was embroiled in such a misunderstanding.

Opinions are just opinions, and people are not obligated to support them with rational arguments. Mr. Dale is merely writing opinion and can’t be faulted for having one. However, in my opinion, it is a belly flop into the turtle pool of hypocrisy to suggest that Maureen Boldt is on council to “stir the pot for the Grits in the hope of a riding nomination”, without also noting obvious examples of councilors who have, or are, stirring the political pot for the Tories in hopes of a riding nomination.

Fair is fair, in anyone’s opinion.

BOB KISMET

www.bobkismet.com

Today, on the front page of the Nugget, an article titled “Parties disagree on health premium” started like this: “The hot-button issue of taxes and the Ontario health premium, an enduring symbol of the Liberal government’s promise-breaking record, took centre stage on the campaign trail Wednesday.”

Perhaps such an article should be on the opinion page, or at the very least carry an “Opinion” heading. Opinion articles masquerading as news are damaging to the public discourse.

I have to believe that a good number of Nugget readers adjust their perceptions to correct for conservative bias, but I know many people who don’t. Therefore, failing to label opinion pieces as such is a form of political manipulation.

In one of the larger metropolitan areas, this wouldn’t be cause for concern, because a person has access to many different media viewpoints, but in North Bay which is fully dominated by the Nugget, it is alarming to say the least.

Here’s hoping that whatever the result of the election in Nipissing, it reflects the will of the people, not the will of the North Bay Nugget.

The writ drops on Monday, and this election promises to be interesting for different reasons than past elections in Ontario have been. This time around, there is no polarizing character or hot-point issues for the parties to rally voters for or against. On the provincial level, it will be fun to watch the parties, and the media struggle to set the tone and frame the public discourse for this election.  

The real fun will be in our riding of Nipissing, where party lines will be blurred as two genuinely interesting and excellent characters vie for the seat. Bill Vrebosch carries the Conservative banner, while Monique Smith seeks to be returned to Queen’s Park for another term. Oh ya – as per usual there will also be an NDP candidate trying to crack double-digit support. I’m sure he is a heck of a nice guy, but he’ll probably get ignored a lot in this blog. At this time, it is unclear whether or not the Green Party will even run a candidate.

There was a time when I would be more likely to eat a bowl of thumbtacks for breakfast than to vote Conservative. Ever since Mulroney and Harris tore the ass out of this country and province respectively, I have had nothing but contempt for that party. In fact, I still do, but although I have nothing good to say about the party, this riding has a Conservative candidate the commands respect. The Singing Mayor of East Ferris, Bill Vrebosch is a man of the people, his integrity and ability are unquestioned, and has built up a reputation for being a pillar of the community over 30 years of public service. I could vote for this man.

I could vote for Bill Vrebosch, but I will probably vote for Monique Smith. I think she has a great record, and I am particularly impressed with the fact that she has maintained grace under pressure as the local media has done a hatchet job on her and the Liberals over the past four years.